Not all here
Question: What’s the biggest health problem in the country today?
Answer: It’s not what you think.
It’s not obesity, diabetes, heart disease, low back pain or cancer.
If you’re thinking depression, you’re getting warm, but that’s still not quite on the mark.
My claim will surprise you, because it’s not biomedical in the conventional sense. It’s almost impossible to measure or track, but it’s very real and has profound consequences across the spectrum of human performance, health and experience.
In fact, the greatest health problem in the country today is presenteeism, the lack of engagement with physicality, life and the body. Allow me to explain…
Presenteeism is a term taken from workplace studies, a variation on the word absenteeism. Presenteeism refers to the condition in which people bring their bodies to the workplace, but leave their attention at home. They’re present, but they’re not really participating in a substantive way. It’s estimated that presenteeism costs American business billions of dollars annually and is even more costly than absenteeism.
Presenteeism in the workplace is bad enough, but there’s another sense of presenteeism that people bring, not just to work, but to their bodies. That is, many of us are markedly disengaged from our physicality; we live in our bodies as passive spectators. We use our bodies as locomotor devices to get from place to place, to fulfill obligations or to sample shallow pleasures, but rarely do we participate fully in the act of being totally physically alive.

Physical presenteeism has now become a genuine epidemic with vast numbers of people who never engage their bodies in any consistent or substantive way. They have vital signs, but are only half alive. They live passively in their bodies, like ghosts.
origins
Full participation and engagement with the physical body has been the historical norm for the vast majority of human history, but modernity has weakened our engagement with ourselves. The process began with technological innovations that made physicality increasingly optional. When motors and engines do all our work for us, there’s no compelling reason to get our bodies involved and people begin to withdraw from their physicality.
Increasing medicalization of human life has also contributed to our non-participation. The invention of antibiotics, technical and pharmaceutical medicine and a highly trained class of body experts leaves the average person out of the loop. When it comes to matters of the body, many of us are now content to leave it to others. Our bodies, it seems, are just not a part of our job description.
Finally, much of our physical presenteeism stems from our experience and relationship with TV and other passive media. The medium promotes disengagement: All you have to do is show up and press a button; no participation or risk is required. As millions of disengaged people spend billions of hours absorbing media, we create a spectator culture. We sit back and become weak, passive spectators of our own bodies.
a disease in itself
It’s almost certainly the case that physical presenteeism leads to biomedical afflictions such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease, low back pain, fibromyalgia and other disorders. After all, when we withdraw our attention and engagement from our physicality, we also take away a powerful source of vitality and energy; in turn, our bodies become more vulnerable to the challenges of the world. Presenteeism also leads to a loss of meaning, a vulnerability to depression and a general weakening of the organism as a whole. It seems probable that a huge percentage of our modern “lifestyle diseases” are either caused or exacerbated by our failure to engage in a meaningful physical relationship with our bodies.
But while the link between presenteeism and disease is almost certainly real, this fact misses the deeper point. That is, quite apart from the health consequences, physical presenteeism is a disease in and of itself, a state of diminished vitality and life. How else would you describe a condition that somehow leads a person to give away a substantial proportion of his or her most precious life experience? Call it an existential disease if you must, but the fact remains: physical presenteeism is not a minor side-effect of the modern human experience. It is a major, debilitating disease that wrecks millions of lives every year.
Ironically, the fitness industry itself promotes this epidemic of physical disengagement by bowing down to the prevailing cultural narrtative that “exercise is boring.” To remedy this presumption, they set up treadmills and other cardio equipment with wide-screen TVs. In this environment, customers can mount the machine, turn off their attention and go unconscious until the buzzer goes off. This is nothing less than a prescription for physical disengagement. Even worse, the whole thing turns out to be a net negative for the exerciser. Any gains made in cardiovascular fitness are offset by the deepening habit of disengagement that people build up in front of the TV. As Jim Loehr put it in his bestselling The Power of Story,
“There’s a staggering amount of waste created every day in gyms across America as seemingly dedicated patrons run on treadmills or climb StairMasters while watching CNBC or ESPN or listening to their iPods, not at all connecting with the physical activity they’re supposedly engaged in.”
Every time a big box gym installs another treadmill with a TV, the fitness industry advances a disengaged lifestyle and a dysfunctional relationship with the body. In this sense, we are definitely part of the problem.
air guitar heroes
At the outset, this distinction between presenteeism and full engagement may seem subtle, but over time it becones immense. Neuroscientist John Medina, author of Brain Rules, makes this point crystal clear when he says “the difference between just showing up and full engagement is the difference between air guitar and actually learning to play the guitar.” You can play air guitar all you want, but it will never make you a musician. For that, you have to engage, sweat, participate and take personal risk, over and over again, for thousands of hours. Merely holding the guitar in your hands will get you nowhere. The analogy is clear: By failing to engage our bodies with depth, substance and authentic participation, we are now creating vast populations of physical air guitarists. It’s no wonder our health is failing.
Woody Allen was wrong
Woody Allen once declared that “Eighty percent of success is showing up.” Coaches and commentators often bring out this quote when they try to motivate people to get past the sticking point of total apathy, hoping to inspire them to get off the couch and actually do something. Obviously, showing up is better than not being there at all, but fundamentally, Woody Allen was completely off the mark. In fact, simply showing up doesn’t get us anywhere near 80% of the way to success. Just showing up for conditioning class or dance, music, job training or any other discipline doesn’t even get us close to learning or high performance. No, we have to get our bodies, our attention and our lives intimately involved in the process. Being present is obviously necessary, but it’s not even close to being sufficient. To revise Allen’s estimate, we might say “Twenty percent of success is showing up. The rest depends on full participation and engagement.”
See also “The Power of Full Engagement” by Jim Loehr and Tony Schwartz
Previous post: Where’s my habitat?
Next post: Old age and emotion prevail


{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }
I LOVE this article. It always bothered me that people set aside a portion of the day for exercise, at the gym, but then wouldn’t want to walk up stairs to get something when they got home.
Actors need that physicality to demonstrate motions from everyday life. They sit in a chair, get up, walk across the floor. But they have to be mindful of it. What they show us looks realistic and “natural,” but if they really sat in the chair and got up and walked the way people really did, it would look awful and we wouldn’t want to watch it. We like to watch how it’s meant to be.
Right on Frank! Very insightful and well-put. Not only are people disengaged, they often regard those of us who aren’t as though WE are some kind of novelty or exception to the species. Crazy!
You hit the nail on the head. Wonderful post. I teach horsemanship to people, and it takes a long time to get them to slow down, engage in the NOW (where horses live all the time), and open up to that moment to moment experience called life.
This post reminds me of my own childhood and being half awake when the teacher would do the roll call. When we’d hear our names we’d say “present” if no one answered we were considered absent.
The monotone of our lifeless responses “present…present…present” said it all.
In schools presenteeism is rampant. Differences in curriculum and teaching and delivery of content matter little. What matters is the engagement of students, involvement, action, true presence of all the senses.
Yes, absolutely! We might even say that presenteeism is what we teach in schools! It’s all about meeting requirements and producing work. It’s no wonder that students stop engaging.
Frank,
Beautifully put. You are such a present writer. Thanks and hope all is well up north. Keep up the good fight.
Ted
Great comments, Frank!
Both of these qualities, absenteeism and presenteeism, are pointing at a lack of grounded awareness in people’s lives.
Your revision of Woody Allen’s statement hits the nail on the head.
But how do people do that? It seems to me that lack of engagement is about efficiency. If things are taken care of for us, we don’t have to be engaged. Not having to be engaged, we don’t do it.
How do people make it more efficient to be engaged than not to be engaged? Is it solely through their story? Their tribe helps to support (or refute) their story…
I’m not sure. I’d love to hear more about your take on how people choose different levels of engagement.
Yes, great question. How about radical clarity of purpose? Our alien environment is so complex, overwhelming and easy, we need something that cuts through the noise. A compelling, intentional, self-authored story seems to offer some promise here. Perhaps all physical training enterprises should start with old stories and revisions. Instead of measuring body fat content or using before-and-after photos, maybe we ought to get out the notebooks and start writing!
I feel that there are some deeply rooted causes to the most obvious outer layers of health. Layers that are timeless and universal, these to some are beyond the obvious and reside in the more subtle realms of reality. The biggest health problem in the country today, or within humanity in regards to the totality of ourselves, which includes the physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual; is perhaps unhealthy parenting/love/self-parenting models. This essentially equates to unfulfilled needs; supposedly 92% of our consciousness is unconscious, leaving us with 8% conscious consciousness. So, perhaps people live their lives in the manner of not knowing what they do not know; believing they are fulfilling their needs, when in actuality it’s only their wants that’s at odds with their needs. In other words the MEME (Mind Virus) that is at odds with the gene, in some cases this ends up being anti-life. Until humanity adopts healthier forms of parenting/love/self-parenting models; the dysfunction, maladaption, dis-ease of ourselves, humanity, and the ground substance that suports life will continue to collapse. The alternative choice, requires a dream that we create a reality that is less destructive to ourselves, our fellow neighbors, and the ground substance of being.
Psychologist – Jerry Wesch, “When you have a big enough dream, you don’t need a crisis.”
For more details:
http://www.psychohistory.com/index.html
http://www.youtube.com/user/LloydDeMause#p/a/f/0/cp8tKUQtEsk
Great words Frank.
Good question Josh, and I like your thought for a solution Frank; skip the “fitness” assessments and go to the notebook…
In my world of coaching, it’s all about developing close relationships with the athletes I help. Knowing, acknowledging, and trying to understand their stories is the doorway to all things that follow.
Correction to the above, unconscious was meant to be subconscious.
I’m inclined to agree, but — evidence? Reasons to think presenteeism causes all these things, other than that we all dislike it?
Good point, so there’s a homework assignment! Let’s explore this more….
Excellent article. If you haven’t already read it I would suggest “The Talent Code” by Daniel Coyle for additional information on this idea.
Yes, a great book!
Thanks for your thought-awakening article!
It seems very clear that modern people are at least in some degree estranged from their physical being. It struck me personally when I decided to learn anew a skill, which I deemed a very natural skill – running –after two decades of more passive life. Physical exercise, preferably in the nature, is really a powerful remedy to revitalize a human life.
I think, that what creates that estrangement and passiveness in many ways, is the consumerism, which has retarded a human, once more active and personally in his/her life engaged, to a situation your article superbly describes. A modern human can’t do anything unless he/she is not able to consume a product/service etc. All we modern people can easily do is to choose from the assortment we are offered by shop-keepers, advertisers, media etc. So is the case with our food, clothes, homes, energy, all our stuff. Even emotional life can be fulfilled by consuming stories and exaggerated emotions, which flow through media. Social life is also powered by products and brands.
Unfortunately that consumer-economy driven by “market-forces” is not in principle aimed to bring wellbeing to us consumers but only money to business owners. The consumer-economy and -society tend to estrange us from our own real needs and also from our sense of responsibility, too. We all see the consequences, when the human race seems to rob the earth and future generations in its desperate attempt to pursue a happiness in a wrong, materialistic way.
What comes to physical exercise, often we are only offered an option to consume something. For example, nobody makes money by tempting us to run barefoot so it is not a choice displayed and is told to be harmful. Running in minimalistic shoes is a good trend, and I like it, but when wearing some branded products I still feel slightly disconnected from what I am really doing. Perhaps I am thinking about my new Vibrams and the natural impression I show…